Decolonising assessment in a clinical training programme within the Charlie Waller Institute

Decolonising assessment in a clinical training programme within the Charlie Waller Institute

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Natalie Meek, School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, n.a.meek@reading.ac.uk
Four green leaves of varying sizes against a black background
Photo by Olia Bondarenko on Unsplash

Overview

Research within psychology has been largely conducted on a group that represent on 12% of the world’s population, those that are Western, educated, industrialised, rich and democratic (WEIRD) populations (Henrich et al., 2010). This colonial legacy, the centralising of the WEIRD population as representative of the human species, indicates a need to decolonise (Winter et al., 2022). The British Association for Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapies (BABCP) who accredit our High Intensity Child, and Adult Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) programmes centre decolonisation and inclusion within their updated curriculum. In response to this, and decolonisation efforts elsewhere in the higher education sector, the aim of the BABCP is to embed EDI within assessment. Assessment is also a focus of this case study as assessment drives learning in higher education (Boud, 1995).

Objectives

  • To change current assessment mark scheme to incorporate a section on EDI.
  • To ensure assessment is in line with BABCP EDI guidance.
  • To encourage student learning through assessment.

Context

The Charlie Waller Institute (CWI) offers graduate and post graduate clinical training courses. The training course discussed here is for High Intensity Adult CBT course, a  year-long post-graduate clinical training course run twice a year with intakes of up to 50 students. The ongoing effort of the University to decolonise is essential within training courses to ensure our trainees are equipped to deliver equitable psychological support to all.

Implementation

The extended case report (ERP) is an assessment used across two modules, a 5,000-word report which is set as part of paired assessment, was explored as a potential vehicle of change. There were some references to the identity of the client within the original mark scheme, however, little exploration of the client’s identity was required to pass the assessment. The High CBT Curriculum 4th Edition (NHS, 2022) states that trainees should be equipped with an understanding of EDI, and that we should support students to understand the needs of their clients in the context of protected characteristics. The curriculum (NHS, 2022) outlines the need for CBT therapists to achieve cultural competence, to be committed to anti-discriminatory clinical practice, and to have knowledge of research on CBT with minoritised groups. As assessment is an opportunity for learning (Sambell, et al., 2013), so this was a key opportunity to meet the BABCP curriculum.

Historically assessment has been neglected in the process of decolonisation within higher education (Godsell, 2021) and this was the case within our course. Changes had been made to lectures, but no changes had been made in assessment. To ensure assessment was aligned with BABCP curriculum (NHS, 2022) and Minimum Training Standards (BABCP, 2022) the method of assessment was not able to be changed, so changes to the original mark scheme were made in two ways. The first was to change what constituted a passing mark for each section of the mark scheme, so that a lack of considerations of power relations in the literature, or protected characteristics would equate to a failing mark (Figure 1). The second change was to redefine item 6, originally Reflection, to Diversity & Inclusion, which is worth 10% of marks (Figure 2). To pass this section students must demonstrate a satisfactory account of protected characteristics (such as age, disability, gender, race, sex and religion) through an exploration of aspects of their client’s identity in CBT literature, and a reflection of their own identity. To support the students in this new aspect of assessment a lecture on “Identity & Values” so the topic was introduced prior to the assessment.

Comparison table of a mark scheme with two columns titled "Original Mark Scheme" and "New Mark Scheme."Transcribed Text: Original Mark Scheme Relating case to relevant literature, displaying knowledge, and understanding of theories and concepts relevant to the case study. New Mark Scheme Relating case to relevant literature, displaying knowledge, and understanding of theories and concepts relevant to the case study, critically evaluating psychology literature. Consider power relationship in psychology literature, such as the colonial history of the subject. Explore existing literature regarding protected characteristics, or comment on the lack thereof. Explore how mental health may present differently in different groups e.g. culture, age, sexuality, gender, and whether interventions or theories are effective for the group that relates to your client.
Figure 1. A comparison between the ‘new’ and ‘old’ marking scheme
Alt-text:Table outlining assessment criteria for diversity and inclusion in clinical settings. Transcribed Text: Diversity & Inclusion – 10% Reflection on protected characteristics and differences between the client and clinician and how the client’s protected characteristics (e.g., session times discussed to be respectful of daily prayers, consideration of relevance of video feedback questions e.g., “redness” for Black clients). Inclusion of relevant literature relating to the protected characteristics of your client. Discussion around any differences in presentation within the client group you are working with, and therefore any adaptations to your treatment, or considerations going forward. Considerations to the colonial history of psychology and psychology literature. Distinction 70 – 100 Excellent account of the client which is comprehensive and provides clear information regarding their protected characteristics and how these have been considered with regards to difference in the therapy space and in terms of potential adaptations to assessment and/or treatment. Excellent reference to relevant literature around protected characteristics of the client. Merit 60 - 69 Good account of the client which is comprehensive and provides clear information regarding most of their protected characteristics and how these have been considered with regards to difference in the therapy space and in terms of potential adaptations to assessment and/or treatment. Good reference to relevant literature around protected characteristics of the client. Pass 50 – 59 Satisfactory account of the client which is comprehensive and provides some information regarding some of their protected characteristics and how these have been considered with regards to difference in the therapy space and in terms of potential adaptations to assessment and/or treatment. Some reference to relevant literature around protected characteristics of the client. Fail 0 - 49 Weak presentation of the client which is not comprehensive and provides little or no information regarding some of their protected characteristics and how these have been considered with regards to the difference in the therapy space and in terms of potential adaptations to assessment and/or treatment. Few reference to relevant literature around protected characteristics of the client.
Figure 2. New diversity and inclusion section in the marking scheme.

Impact

Student and marker feedback indicates the three objectives of this project have been met: the assessment and mark scheme incorporates EDI,  the changes are in line with BABCP guidance for EDI, and these changes have facilitated student learning. The changes to the mark scheme were rolled out for two modules of the HI CBT Adult course and adopted by the HI CBT Childrens course also. Feedback from markers indicate a noticeable increase in the student’s consideration of the client’s identity, and a diversification of CBT literature utilised for reports. In the Theory and Practice for Depression (PYMDEP) module evaluation, students’ ratings of “course content/examples/case studies selected (or used) offer a diversity perspective” has increased from an average of 3.5 to 4.4, where 5 means definitely agree. Although this feedback is not solely regarding changes to assessment, it does indicate change has been recognised and is having a positive impact.

Reflections

Decolonisation, and developing cultural competence are both ongoing processes, which require lifelong learning. This change in assessment has been one step in meeting BABCP curriculum guidance (NHS, 2022) and in training our therapy workforce to deliver anti-discriminatory, and effective therapy for diverse groups of people. This change has happened in line with lecture content changes, such as the introduction of teaching day on working with neurodivergence, gender & sexuality, and religion & spirituality.

Follow up

One change within an assessment does not end the ongoing process of decolonisation and of the integration of EDI within higher education. Going forward it would be good to get more feedback directly from students’ assessment, and any further work we can do to continue to decolonise the course and ensure all peoples can access equitable psychological support.

References

Supporting academic and social transition of first year speech and language therapy students

Supporting academic and social transition of first year speech and language therapy students

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Mirjana Sokolovic-Perovic & Joe Spackman, Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, m.sokolovic@reading.ac.uk, j.spackman@reading.ac.uk 
yellow smiley emoji balloons on grey textile
Photo by Tim Mossholder on Unsplash

Overview

This is an overview of a buddy system for speech and language therapy students which aims to support students’ academic and social transition to university and to enhance their sense of belonging and wellbeing. We paired each first-year student with a second-year ‘buddy’ and provided opportunities for the two cohorts to get together.

Objectives

  • To support academic and social transition of first year MSc and MSci speech and language therapy (SLT) students
  • To help build a community of students and a peer-support network
  • To support development of students’ sense of belonging, and to enhance their wellbeing
  • To enable students to start building a professional network

Context

Transition to higher education has been recognised as a multi-layered process involving academic, social and lifestyle adjustments. It has a long-term impact on students’ academic achievement and satisfaction, social integration, mental health and wellbeing, and retention rates (Briggs et al., 2012).

Peer support has been suggested as an effective strategy in supporting various aspect of student transition (Heirdsfield et al., 2005). For students on allied health programmes, Health Education England (HEE) have advocated for a student buddy scheme in HE institutions, advising it provides educational, social and pastoral support (Stokes, 2022). Peer-to-peer support adds an extra layer of student support and is often the first step in accessing professional services. HEE report on attrition and retention (Lovegrove, 2018) found that healthcare students who had participated in a buddy scheme felt it was important to settling into the course and helped with engagement, learning and any possible anxieties and fears.

This has led us to consider how the existing SLT peer-support scheme could be improved to aids SLT students’ academic and social transition.

Implementation

Recent feedback indicated that first year students felt anxious and sometimes lonely, not knowing what to expect from the programme and from day-to-day life as SLT students. They needed a wider community of SLT students they could reach out to for advice and support.

A buddy system has existed in Clinical Language Sciences department in the past, where each first-year student was paired with a second-year student (there are currently around 215 students on the two SLT programmes: approximately 40–45 students in each MSci cohort, and 20–30 students in each MSc cohort). However, it was left to students to initiate and maintain contact, and consequently the uptake was low and there was little impact on student experience. Unfortunately, during the Covid-19 pandemic and in the following years, this has fallen away, and the scheme was abandoned.

In academic year 2023–24, we decided to reconsider our approach and to revive the SLT buddy scheme, by not only pairing students from different cohorts, but also by providing them a safe space on campus where they could meet and socialise with students from the year above.

Students were allocated a buddy at random. Pairings were shared with both cohorts via email and advertised in teaching sessions. Students were invited to an informal get together where buddies could both meet each other in person and get to know the other cohort. Students were encouraged to either contact their buddy beforehand or to arrange to meet at the get together. Two different formats were used for MSci and MSc students because of different cohort sizes.

For the MSc SLT cohorts, which are smaller than the MSci groups, a room was booked on campus at a lunch time and both cohorts were invited. Attendance was high for this meeting. We organised a small ice-breaker activity and had talking point questions and well-being activities (colouring-in, pom-pom making) available. The students were very welcoming of each other and conversations started immediately and spontaneously throughout the session.

The MSci SLT cohorts are larger, and for this buddy get-together we booked two rooms, with the same format. However, the attendance was lower, so in the end we only used the larger room.

Impact

Participants were asked to complete a MS Forms questionnaire about their experiences. Student feedback was very positive overall, demonstrating achievement of our initial objectives:

‘It was so reassuring talking to the 2nd year students and widening our network of SLTs in the department. I intend to keep in touch with my buddy.’

‘Really good opportunities to mingle and talk. Like that it was a big group so we could meet more people than just our buddy….’

‘I thought it was a lovely idea. I got to speak to my buddy in a chilled environment.’

‘The informality of the session worked really well to get to know each other and find out about the specific information….’

Reflections

Buddy meet-up sessions were very successful. The atmosphere was relaxed and student feedback suggested that it helped them settle better into the new environment.

First year MSc students reported that speaking with a second-year buddy alleviated some of their anxieties about the workload and studying on a professional course. They suggested that they would prefer the buddy system to start earlier in the academic year, and to have regular meetups, which is something we will try to implement for the next year.

Our reflections on the lower attendance for the MSci cohort led us to consider whether there was some uncertainty among the second-year undergraduate students about the role of a buddy and expectations in terms of their engagement. We could have provided more support on this. HEE suggests creating a buddy fact sheet/contract to explain the scheme and boundaries (Lovegrove, 2018). Next year we plan to introduce this at the beginning of the process.

Following some feedback about the impact of interacting in a large space with multiple students, we will investigate different options for the environment to support students who may find this uncomfortable or challenging.

Follow up

Using an adapted Learning Cycle (Kolb, 1984), we will continue to refine the format of the buddy scheme, based on feedback from this year’s cohorts and subsequent cohorts, making sure that these events benefit all groups of students.

The reflections and recommendations on the SLT buddy scheme have been shared at an Advance HE Conference (May 2024) and PCLS Teaching and Learning Away Day (July 2024).

Links and further reading

References

ChatGPT: A conversational language study tool

ChatGPT: A conversational language study tool

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Jackie Baines and Edward A. S. Ross, Department of Classics, School of Humanities, j.baines@reading.ac.uk and edward.ross@reading.ac.uk
classical Greek/Roman style columns on a classical ruin with a bright futuristic sky background
Photo by Yusuf Dündar on Unsplash

Overview

This project outlines the work undertaken in the Department of Classics to demystify generative artificial intelligence for ancient language staff and students over the 2023-2024 academic year.

Objectives

  • Codify and standardise methods for using conversational AI models (such as ChatGPT, Claude-2, and Google Bard) in ancient language classes.
  • Produce tested guiding phrase documents for students to copy and paste into conversational AI models so that their outputs are standardised to match course expectations.
  • Lead interactive testing sessions in all levels of ancient language classes (i.e. Latin and Ancient Greek) to test these documents and inform students about the ethical considerations for using generative AI.

Context

At the time when this project was instigated, there was a dramatic surge of generative AI development and use at a generally accessible level. This led to extreme anxiety among educators and students alike as to how these tools could impact the known models for teaching, learning, and assessment in classics and beyond. We sought to approach this issue ‘head on’ in order to contextualise the nature and value of generative AI tools for staff and students, dispelling any unwarranted preconceptions and informing them of necessary ethical considerations.

Implementation

  • Surveyed ancient language teaching staff about the necessary elements of their courses.
  • Led sessions with staff to develop the departmental AI guidelines and citation guide in Summer 2023.
  • Led AI ethics information sessions for all undergraduate and postgraduate students in the Department of Classics over the Autumn 2023 term.
  • Held survey sessions with all ancient language students studying Ancient Greek and Latin, gathering data on their views on generative AI before and after the information sessions, in Autumn 2023.
  • Hired three undergraduate research assistants to test guiding phrases on a variety of conversational AI tools to determine the effectiveness of the tools and guiding phrases for supporting various aspects of their ancient language learning.
  • Published the tested guiding phrases as a digital and physical pamphlet for staff and students to freely use in March 2024.
  • Recorded and published a series of tutorial videos on generative AI ethics and digital tools for Classics.
  • Carried out a follow-up survey in Spring 2024 with the same ancient language students that completed the Autumn 2023 survey to gauge the impact generative AI had on their studies over the 2023-2024 academic year.
  • Analysed and published survey data in two academic journal articles (one is currently in press) and on secure data repositories.

Impact

The initial intention for this project was to investigate how effective generative AI tools were for supporting ancient language teaching and learning, but our research and response from students led us to work more towards improving general AI literacy among humanities teachers and students. When we were giving our ethics presentations, teachers and students were shocked by the ethical considerations behind generative AI, especially the environmental and copyright implications, and as soon as they saw this and learned that their own work could be used to train these models, they were much more sceptical of using the tools. At the time of writing, the tutorial videos and guiding phrase pamphlet have been downloaded around 150 times each, and this continues to grow as we present our tutorials to future course groups.

Reflections

We found this work was successful in many ways, particularly through our collaboration with our undergraduate students. By working with our students, who are seeing large swaths of generative AI tools on a daily basis, we were able to get a wider perspective on the impact and use cases of these tools for ancient language teaching and learning. Any research into generative AI and teaching and learning should involve student-teacher collaboration. In some aspects, we were also interdisciplinary in our reach, making some presentations for the Modern Languages Department, but there is scope for many more interdisciplinary collaborations for this work. In the future, we intend to continue making ethics tutorials for ancient language students, and the materials developed during this TLEP-funded project will help us illustrate the current issues more effectively.

Links

Further reading

  • Ross, E. A. S., & Baines, J. (2024). Treading water: New data on the impact of AI ethics information sessions in classics and ancient language pedagogy. Journal of Classics Teaching, 25(50), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2058631024000412
Blending problem-based learning (PBL) and real-world scenarios on foundation economics: IFP

Blending problem-based learning (PBL) and real-world scenarios on foundation economics: IFP

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Dr Veundjua Muruko-Jaezuruka, ISLI (International Study and Language Institute), v.muruko-jaezuruka@reading.ac.uk
stack of jigsaw puzzle pieces
Photo by Hans-Peter Gauster on Unsplash

Overview

This case study explores blending problem-based learning (PBL) and real-world scenarios on foundation economics. By embracing PBL, encourages deep learning, real-world application, and fosters a global perspective in students. In addition to enhancing academic achievement, it prepares students for further academic studies and future professional challenges in a globalised world.

Objectives

  • To build a deep understanding of foundational economic theories and concepts, while engaging students in practical applications that stimulate critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
  • The aim is to bridge the knowledge gap for international students who may face challenges transitioning into higher education systems.

Context

On the International Foundation Programme (IFP), we are committed to enhancing the student experience through creative and effective teaching strategies. An innovative approach I introduced on the Foundation Economics modules was the integration of Problem-Based Learning (PBL), in response to student feedback. With an average cohort size of 28, the module offers a supportive and interactive learning environment. Previously, students engaged mainly through quizzes, short-answer tasks, calculations, and textbook-based case studies, with limited real-world application. The shift to PBL marked a significant change, as students tackled real economic issues—such as market failures and government intervention in Microeconomics—through collaborative group work. They researched and critically analysed real-world problems, then proposed possible government intervention/solutions. This approach not only deepened engagement and critical thinking but also developed transferable academic and professional skills aligned with the expectations of higher education and future employment.

Implementation

  1. PBL: Each week, students were presented with real-world economic challenges, such as analysing global trade disputes, inflation crises, or the impact of taxation on different economies. This PBL approach moves beyond traditional lectures, prompting students to work in small groups to research, analyse, and propose solutions using core economic principles.
  2. To encourage more active participation, we adopted the flipped classroom approach. Students access lectures online at home and come to class prepared to engage in discussions, debates, and hands-on activities based on the theoretical content they’ve already absorbed. By shifting lower-order learning to independent study, resulted in more engagement, through interactive tasks. This change enhanced retention of complex economic concepts, and students reported feeling more confident in applying theory to practice.
  3. Cross-cultural perspectives: Given the international nature of the IFP, the module includes case studies from different countries, fostering discussions on how economic principles apply across diverse global contexts. Students were encouraged to draw on their own countries’ economic policies, enhancing relatability and relevance adding unique insights and enriching the learning experience.
  4. Interactive database technologies: Students were introduced to economic databases to analyse trends in GDP, inflation, and unemployment rates. These not only support the application of economic theory but also equip students with skills required in the modern data-driven world.

Impact

– Critical thinking and collaboration: Students developed critical thinking skills by working through ambiguous economic problems in teams -such as the impact of recent inflation on living standards and how this affects students’ daily lives, or the externalities of production and their environmental consequences, encouraging students to propose relevant policy solutions – learning to debate and defend their solutions. Student feedback indicated higher confidence in tackling complex economic problems, a skill crucial for their success in undergraduate studies.

– Global awareness: Students gained a global perspective on economics, appreciating the nuances of economic policies and their impacts in various regions around the world. By creating a learning community where students’ diverse experiences are valued (see Lave and Wenger’s Social Learning Theory, 1991), we fostered a collaborative and inclusive learning environment.

Reflections

Integrating PBL with digital tools (query interface built-in databases – like Statista, ONS and the World Bank Data Portal – transformed the classroom from a space for passive content delivery to a dynamic environment for exploration. One significant benefit was how it catered to different learning styles; students who excelled in independent research complemented those who thrived in group discussions, creating a holistic learning experience. These impacts were evident through classroom observations, where diverse strengths emerged during group tasks, as well as through end-of-seminar student surveys.

While the flipped classroom model was largely successful, there were some challenges, particularly in ensuring all students completed the pre-class materials. To address this going forward, short accountability measures, such as online quizzes, to track progress will be implemented. Some students also required more support transitioning to this self-directed learning model, so additional tutorials will be provided for those who need extra guidance.

I aim to develop a stronger feedback loop, where students regularly reflect on the flipped classroom model’s effectiveness, ensuring that the approach evolves in line with their learning needs.

Follow up

  • Expanding the use of PBL to cover all major topics in the curriculum
  • Introducing additional digital tools and simulations to further enrich the learning experience.
  • Providing continuous professional development for staff to adapt and refine these innovative teaching strategies.

Feedback on the effectiveness of PBL has been collected, and this approach will be incorporated (in seminars) into curriculum areas that students find challenging – identified through their own feedback.

References

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Introducing self-practice/self-reflection sessions on the high-intensity training course in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)

Introducing self-practice/self-reflection sessions on the high-intensity training course in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Julia Limper, Charlie Waller Institute, j.limper@reading.ac.uk
Pink flamingo on water during daytime
Photo by Chris Stenger on Unsplash

Overview

This article discusses the integration of Self-Practice and Self-Reflection (SP/SR) into our as part of cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) programs. SP/SR is designed to enhance therapists’ practical skills and emotional resilience by addressing gaps in traditional training methods and helping trainees manage the emotional demands of their learning.

Objectives

The primary goal of introducing SP/SR was to deepen trainees’ understanding of CBT through reflective practices, by supporting trainees to move from rigid adherence to more flexible and competent use of CBT techniques. Additionally, the program sought to provide emotional support during the intensive training process by incorporating opportunities for reflection and normalisation of course challenges smaller groups.

Context

Self-Practice/Self-Reflection (SP/SR) is recognised as a valuable tool for acquiring and refining CBT skills, enhancing both competence and emotional resilience (Bennett-Levy et al., 2009). This approach involves practicing CBT techniques on oneself (self-practice) and then reflecting on both personal benefits and challenges, as well as potential implications for patient work (self-reflection).The approach aligns with the NHS England Curriculum for HI (high intensity) trainees, which emphasises experiential learning and self-reflection (NHS England, 2022). While longer SP/SR formats exist and offer more extensive evidence of their benefits, the shorter format used here was designed to meet the course structure’s time constraints and to lay the groundwork for trainees to continue the practice independently.

In practice, many trainees acknowledged the importance of SP/SR but found it difficult to engage with SP/SR as a solely self-directed element due to the demanding nature of their course. This reflects the broader challenges faced by trainees in intensive programs (Boud & Walker, 1998).

The course involves intensive clinical training, provided through a mixture of lectures which include practicing clinical skills through role-plays, and supervision, provided in smaller groups of a maximum of four students. The lectures allow trainees to learn core skills, whilst supervision supports refining these skills and applying them to specific patient challenges.

Implementation

To address these challenges, SP/SR was integrated into four structured supervision sessions The format included:

  • Initial lecture: Introducing goals, ground rules, and safeguarding strategies.
  • Four SP/SR sessions (scheduled for 1 hour and 45 minutes)
      1. Setting and discussing personal goals.
      2. Evaluating techniques and maintenance cycles (maps that show how the trainees beliefs and behaviours could be maintaining a challenge).
      3. Open discussion on selected topics related to personal or professional challenges.
      4. Reflecting on endings and future use of SP/SR in professional practice.

To support trainees, a handbook, screencasts, and ongoing supervision guidance were provided, encouraging engagement and accountability in the reflective process.

Results and impact

The feedback from trainees, gathered through an online questionnaire showed positive reception to SP/SR in terms of its impact on skill development, wellbeing, and group cohesion. The whole cohort (N=28) was asked for feedback, with 17 responses received (61% response rate).

  • Around 70% agreed that SP/SR sessions contributed significantly to their growth as CBT therapists, with most others somewhat agreeing.
  • 64% found the sessions beneficial for their overall wellbeing.
  • 76% felt SP/SR improved their connection with peers and supervisors, fostering a greater sense of group cohesion.

In terms of session frequency, just over half of the cohort felt the number of sessions was ideal, with some wanting more opportunities to engage in the practice.

Qualitative feedback revealed that the dedicated time for SP/SR in supervision sessions was particularly appreciated. One trainee noted the value of having structured time for reflection on CBT practices, which might otherwise be neglected. Supervisors also observed that discussing SP/SR in small groups led to a deeper understanding among students and highlighted its potential to improve clinical practice.

Discussion and limitations

While SP/SR was well received by trainees, the evaluation had certain limitations, most importantly the reliance on self-reporting. The lack of objective measures of SP/SR’s direct impact on clinical practice or wellbeing leaves room for further investigation. Moreover, focusing primarily on professional self-reflection may limit its effectiveness. Expanding the approach to include reflections on both personal and professional challenges could enhance its utility (Chaddock et al., 2014).

Reflections

The introduction of SP/SR demonstrated its value in supporting both the professional development and emotional resilience of HI trainees. However, refining the programme, incorporating objective outcome measures, and addressing both personal and professional reflections may enhance its impact. Ongoing adjustments will be needed to further align SP/SR with the evolving needs of trainees.

Follow up and future directions

Future evaluations should focus on the long-term impact of SP/SR on trainees’ clinical practice and emotional well-being. Additionally, exploring how trainees continue to use SP/SR after formal training and how services can support this practice is essential. For future cohorts, a more formalised assessment process, combining both quantitative and qualitative feedback, will provide clearer insights into SP/SR’s effectiveness.

References

  • Bennett-Levy, J., McManus, F., Westling, B. E., & Fennell, M. (2009). Acquiring and refining CBT skills and competencies: which training methods are perceived to be most effective? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37(5), 571–583.
  • Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Studies in higher education, 23(2), 191–206.
  • Chaddock, A., Thwaites, R., Bennett-Levy, J., & Freeston, M. H. (2014). Understanding individual differences in response to Self-Practice and Self-Reflection (SP/SR) during CBT training. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 7, e14.
  • NHS England (2022). Curriculum for High-Intensity CBT Trainees.
  • Thwaites, R., & Bennett-Levy, J. (2014). Using Self-Practice and Self-Reflection (SP/SR) to Enhance CBT Competence and Metacompetence. How to become a more effective CBT therapist: Mastering metacompetence in clinical practice, 239–254.

Taking ownership over our success: Empowering postgraduate trainee teachers

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Scarlett Murphy, Institute of Education (IoE), s.l.e.murphy@reading.ac.uk
Decorative image
© University of Reading

Context

Throughout my experience working with postgraduate trainee teachers, I have observed how important it is for trainees to feel empowered to advocate for themselves, particularly those who are parents or carers, those managing anxiety and depression, and those with additional needs like autism or ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder). Balancing the demands of placement with personal responsibilities can be overwhelming, but I believe that taking ownership of our own success and finding ways to do this once qualified is critical, especially considering the recent guidance surrounding an increase in students with disabilities.

One of the key challenges I have seen is the pressure that comes with meeting the Teachers’ Standards, while managing additional personal or learning needs. To address this, I worked closely with a group of trainee teachers who identified themselves as needing extra support. I collaborated with these students to develop additional resources to help them manage their time and workload, communicate effectively with their mentors, and build the confidence to advocate for themselves during their placements.

Implementation

The group I worked with included trainees from diverse backgrounds, many of whom were balancing the demands of their training with caregiving responsibilities, mental health challenges, or neurodiverse conditions like autism and ADHD. Together, we created practical resources such as letter templates, draft timetables, and guidance on how to initiate open discussions with mentors about their needs. I found that giving them tools to better communicate with their mentors had a huge impact, helping them establish stronger working relationships and ultimately supporting their ability to meet the required standards without feeling overwhelmed.

Beyond developing communication tools, I also encouraged these trainees to review the University’s placement preparation materials. Their feedback was eye-opening, and they helped me see how we could adjust the content to be more relevant to their needs. They also suggested adding new sessions to the program that would address specific barriers to their learning, such as managing workload when living with ADHD or balancing placement duties with family care. This collaboration not only supported the individual trainees but also created a richer learning environment for everyone involved. It was a clear example of how working collaboratively and sharing best practices can benefit the entire group.

Reflections

One of the most rewarding aspects of this work was seeing how it gave these students a voice. Their ideas and experiences were crucial in shaping the resources we created. They were not just recipients of support—they were active contributors to the process, and this empowered them further. My next step is to share these resources with their mentors, helping to bridge the gap between trainees and schools. This step will be essential in creating a more supportive and inclusive placement experience.

In addition to supporting the students directly, these resources also have the potential to reduce the workload of academic tutors by providing consistent, ready-made tools that can be easily adapted to different trainees’ needs. Working closely with our Disability Advisory Service, the goal is to ensure that these resources complement the existing support provided, making placements more manageable and successful for trainees with additional needs. The ongoing aim is not only to support trainee teachers in their training year but give them the skills to use in their career after graduation.

Through this process, I have also come to realise that far more students have additional needs or unique circumstances than I initially thought. This aligns with current guidance on academic tutoring, which emphasises the importance of making adjustments to support all students and those who have not yet received a formal diagnosis.

Next steps

The next steps to the project are to create a booklet with all the resources and university support links for all trainee teachers and share them more broadly with all schools where our students are on placement.

By empowering postgraduate trainee teachers to advocate for themselves and by creating a supportive framework, I am confident that we can ensure more trainees thrive during their placements and beyond. This work is about fostering a culture of self-advocacy, collaboration, and inclusion—values that are essential for the success of all future teachers.

Reflections of an additional research assistant on a UROP project

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Hannah Raheja, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, Bc007055@student.reading.ac.uk
Decorative image
© Photo by Nick Morrison

Overview

The Undergraduate Research Opportunities Programme (UROP) consists of different projects students can apply to gain research experience. Each project attracts significant numbers of student applicants, but only one is selected. This year, UROP had a project examining the impact of staff racial representation on students’ sense of belonging. I applied to this due to my interest in the topic and despite not being selected as the leading researcher, I was asked to be a research assistant, something that is not typical during UROP projects. This blog will explore my experience as a research assistant and the positive implications this has had on both my personal and professional development. To view the aims and findings of this project, please see Denethri Gamagedara’s blog.

Context

The interest in this study regarding students’ sense of belonging transpired from the Race Equality Review (UoR, 2021) findings, which suggested that staff racial representation directly impacted the sense of belonging, engagement, and attainment within the class.

Denethri Gamagedara conducted this project during her UROP placement over the summer. I (Hannah Raheja) worked as a research assistant, helping with thematic analysis and research dissemination (alongside being a UROP student on another project). This project had two supervisors: Anjali Mehta Chandar, a Lecturer within the Charlie Waller Institute (CWI) and Allán Laville, the Associate Pro-Vice-Chancellor Diversity and Inclusion and Professor of Equity in Psychology. Having a research assistant is not usual practice for UROP studies due to the typical focus of one student obtaining one-to-one research experience with supervisors.

My experience as a research assistant

At first, I worried about working with Denethri as I assumed there would be challenges with power dynamics since I was the research assistant and she was the leading researcher. Furthermore, as I had interviewed for the position and had been unsuccessful, I felt that perhaps my ideas were less beneficial than the other team members. Moreover, as Denethri, Anjali and Allan had been working with each other for 4 weeks before I joined their team (they had conducted interviews and a survey with students), I was also apprehensive about how my presence would affect the team dynamic.

However, once I joined the group, I found my worries unwarranted. Denethri and I had regular Microsoft Teams meetings where we built upon each other’s ideas, collaboratively generated themes for reflexive thematic analysis (e.g. diversity in education), and asked each other for feedback. In addition, when meeting with Anjali, Allan and Denethri to discuss the codes Denethri and I had established (e.g. for the theme diversity and education, we had codes such as lecturers and teaching material address diversity), both supervisors frequently asked me for my input, affirming that my ideas were beneficial and helping me to feel like an essential member of the project.  Likewise, Anjali emailed and provided me with feedback throughout my time on the team, helping nurture my research skills. I also later discovered that the research assistant position was made for myself and was funded by the Lecturer’s SDA account because I had impressed the supervisors during the interview.

Furthermore, in response to the survey and interview answers, Denethri and I collaboratively agreed upon different recommendations to foster student belonging, which we then presented to Anjali and Allán, who provided us with guidance. To begin with, I struggled to generate recommendations since I had not been present during the interviews and so I did not have an accurate grasp of the problem. Appreciatively, Denethri patiently answered my queries, helping me understand the situation and from this, we both came up with six different ways to foster a sense of belonging within the teaching environment. Denethri and I then created a screencast for lecturers within CWI explaining each of the recommendations. The recommendations include:

  • sharing your protected characteristics with new cohorts (as much as you feel comfortable),
  • acknowledging cultural events (e.g. Diwali) during lectures,
  • creating a diversity discussion blog where minority lecturers can share their teaching journeys and how their protected characteristics have impacted their profession,
  • continuing to implement diverse teaching resources by referencing decolonising the curriculum,
  • incorporating discussions about sense of belonging with all students during academic tutorial meetings and creating safe spaces for minority students to discuss their sense of belonging –whether in academic tutorial, online forums or other settings.

Being a part of this process has been an incredible experience as I have developed competencies as an undergraduate researcher while also having the broader implications of developing beneficial recommendations to foster inclusion within the university further. As a student within CWI, I hope these recommendations will be implemented so that all students will feel a sense of belonging within their lectures and throughout their wider university experience.

Summary

To summarise, I was asked to join this project as a research assistant and due to joining this study partway through, I experienced some initial anxiety. However, a successful student-staff partnership was formed between Denethri, supervisors, and myself, with Anjali allowing Denethri and I to express our opinions openly and Allán supporting us to engage with a project with pedagogic implications. This role has helped to develop my analytical, data, and research proficiencies further – all of which would not have been possible without my experience as a research assistant. These positive outcomes will hopefully encourage other supervisors to consider hiring an extra student to help analyse findings and disseminate their UROP project. To best utilise this additional research assistance, regular meetings between all parties should occur, supervisors should actively engage and include the research assistant in the discussions and provide them with constructive feedback on their work.

Acknowledgements

This article would not have been possible without the support and advice of Denethri Gamagedara, Anjali Mehta Chandar, and Allán Laville.

References

Embedding entrepreneurship and technology literacy in the student curriculum: A case study of a module for real estate students

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Dr Matteo Borghi, Henley Business School, m.borghi4@henley.ac.uk
Decorative image
Exclusive study visit to Savills headquarters in London by students, one of the practical employability outcomes of the curriculum and assessment redesign © Matteo Borghi

Overview

The Managing Change in the Real Estate Sector module was redesigned to embed entrepreneurship (the ability to identify and seize business opportunities) and technology literacy, aiming to bridge academic learning with real-world industry demands. The initiative significantly improved student engagement, understanding of PropTech (technology-driven innovation in Real Estate) trends and practical application of entrepreneurial skills, as reflected in enhanced student satisfaction and successful project outcomes.

Objectives

Foster students’ entrepreneurship skills (such as opportunity recognition, innovation, and problem-solving) and technology literacy, particularly in the context of PropTech (short for Property Technologies).

  • Encourage creative problem-solving and the development of innovative business ideas.
  • Enhance students’ practical understanding of industry trends through direct engagement with experts.
  • Improve student confidence and readiness for entrepreneurial careers in real estate through authentic assessments.

Context

The Managing Change in the Real Estate Sector module was developed to address the evolving needs of the real estate industry, particularly the integration of technology literacy (the ability to effectively use and understand modern technologies) and entrepreneurial skills. It was introduced in response to industry demands for graduates proficient in PropTech (technology-driven innovation in Real Estate) and capable of innovative thinking. In this context, entrepreneurial skills refer to the ability to identify opportunities, adapt to changing circumstances, and implement creative solutions within the real estate sector. The module, which carries 20 credits, is compulsory for approximately 120 Level 5 students each year.

Implementation

To implement the module, several key steps were taken:

  1. Module Design and Collaboration: The curriculum was developed in collaboration with internal teams, including the Henley career services and the Henley Centre for Entrepreneurship, to ensure alignment with industry needs and academic goals.
  2. Guest Lectures and Forums: External experts were invited to provide insights into PropTech and entrepreneurship, culminating in the Global Henley PropTech Forum (GHPTF) where students engaged with industry leaders. In the GHPTF, we included a general Q&A and an interactive co-creation session where students collaborated with industry leaders to refine the business ideas they had developed with the seminar leader during the first six weeks of the module.
  3. Dragons’ Den Assessment: A competitive pitching event was organised, where student teams presented their business ideas to a panel of judges, simulating a real-world entrepreneurial experience. This event mirrored the format of the famous British television show Dragons’ Den, where aspiring entrepreneurs pitch their business ideas to a panel of investors (Dragons) seeking promising ventures. To prepare for the Dragons’ Den assessment, students engaged in weekly seminar sessions, mock presentations with cross-fertilisation between teams, and a dedicated ‘Pitching to Sell’ workshop.
  4. Continuous Feedback and Adjustment: Throughout the module, student feedback was actively solicited and used to make real-time adjustments, enhancing the learning experience and addressing concerns.
  5. Support Structures: The module included mentoring and support from faculty, promoting an environment conducive to innovative thinking and teamwork.
Decorative image
Dragons’ Den 2024 © Erno Frak

Impact

The module successfully achieved its objectives, as reflected in students’ positive feedback on experiential learning methods (4.3/5). Integrating entrepreneurship and technology literacy greatly enhanced students’ understanding of real estate and PropTech. This resulted in improved business propositions and heightened student engagement, praised by both internal and external contributors. An unexpected outcome was the module’s selection as the main compulsory team project for future students. Additionally, a student venture developed during the module was shortlisted in the European PropTech competition, demonstrating the initiative’s success in fostering critical real-world skills such as problem-solving, creative thinking, digital proficiency, and the ability to navigate the intersection of technology and business.

Reflections

The success of the module stemmed from its integration of real-world experiences with academic learning, enhanced by effective collaboration with industry experts and external events. Key elements included the Global Henley PropTech Forum and Dragons’ Den assessments, which provided students with invaluable exposure to real-world scenarios and feedback. The responsiveness to mid-module feedback and adaptation of content and support mechanisms significantly contributed to student satisfaction and engagement.

Decorative image
Global Henley PropTech Forum 2023 © Matteo Borghi

However, some challenges remained. Coordination issues with guest speakers and unexpected withdrawals from the Dragons’ Den highlighted the need for more robust contingency planning. Additionally, while student feedback on individualised guidance was addressed, further improvement in personal mentorship could enhance the learning experience. Future iterations could benefit from more structured self-assessment and additional real-world case studies to deepen students’ understanding and application of entrepreneurial concepts. Overall, the module demonstrated a strong capacity to evolve and adapt, ensuring its continued relevance and effectiveness.

Follow up

Since the module’s implementation, it has garnered additional industry support. Savills, a prominent global real estate services provider, has endorsed a revised version of the Dragons’ Den, featuring a grand final and a study visit for the winning team (see title image above). Additionally, an exclusive internship opportunity was offered by one of the Dragons. The 2024 winning team, Senspore, also achieved significant success by securing £3,000 for the best commercialisation idea for China at Henley Business School’s IDEAFEST student business idea competition.

Decorative image
Senspore winning the best commercialisation idea for China at Henley Business School’s IDEAFEST student business idea competition © Matteo Borghi

Links

The published article can be downloaded for free from Innovations in Education and Teaching International.

The Hidden Curriculum Glossary – supporting transitions with student-created resources

The Hidden Curriculum Glossary – supporting transitions with student-created resources

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

By: Amanda Millmore, The School of Law, a.millmore@reading.ac.uk

Overview

As a way of helping new students to transition to university, our student-staff partnership co-created a “Hidden Curriculum Glossary.” The original glossary has been shared with students in the School of Law, used as the basis for a guide for first generation students at the University of Reading and has been adopted and adapted by universities across the sector, both in Law and other disciplines.

Objectives

The “hidden curriculum” has varied definitions but relates to the lack of connection between academics’ assumptions about students and how they should behave and what happens in reality. This includes implicit aspects of the taught curriculum as well as the academic expectations. The project aimed to get first generation Law students to help new entrants to understand some of the terminology and behavioural expectations of university by co-creating supportive resources.

Context

The adverse impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on students’ sense of belonging has been challenging. This partnership project worked with first generation Law students to brainstorm ideas to improve a sense of community and belonging within the Law School. The project led to positive ideas to benefit our community, as well as the creation of resources to support transition for all students.

Implementation

We recruited 8 paid student-partners; we pay them for their time to ensure a diverse group of students and as always, we are adopting the University’s Principles of Partnership.

Together we shared ideas to improve the sense of community and belonging which were taken forwards by the School’s Student Experience Committee and we identified suggestions to help incoming students.

One important output of our partnership was our quick guide to terminology and expectations – the Hidden Curriculum Glossary. Students shared what they wished they had known before starting and in their first year of university, and we co-created a helpful and colourful document demystifying key terms and concepts, written in plain English and tailored for what new students need to know.

The glossary was printed and shared with incoming undergraduate and postgraduate students as part of their transition materials in Welcome Week. Students also created “Top Tips” videos for new students and a video guide to our building. All of the resources are also shared electronically via Blackboard.

We have updated the glossary each year to incorporate student feedback and to include any changes. So for example, in its second year we added in more information about the Careers team and how they can help students.

What it all means - studying Law at the University of Reading! This is a guide created by students for students, to help you understand what some of the words we use while studying mean. We hope you find it helpful! STUDYING LAW AT THE UNIVERSITY OF READING Co-curricular activities: Things you do along with your Law degree. They can be law related like mooting, negotiation skills, client interviewing and mediation or they may be clubs, societies and hobbies you get involved with. Foxhill House: Home to the School of Law - we have some classrooms here, lots of offices and a student common room. All Law students are welcome. We also have some offices in Edith Morley building. LLB: Bachelor of Laws - this is your degree programme and is the qualification you are awarded at the end of the course. Module: A module is a subject with a set number of credits assigned to it. You can find a number of compulsory and optional modules to complete each year.

The glossary is designed to support student transition and retention. It received very positive feedback from Law students via a questionnaire to all who received it, for example here is some of the qualitative feedback we received:

Screenshot of a PowerPoint slide. It reads: Evaluating the Glossary: How specifically did it help you? “How and who to contact for help if need be.” “The key websites that I’d be visiting frequently and who to ask for help in different circumstances. Assessment and marking section was really helpful.” "Familiarity with all the new terms I had never come across regarding my learning." “It gave me more of an understanding of the structure of the law school and what everything means. It had also clarified the definitions of the assessment terms as I had been struggling with understanding them.” “How the assessments work, how teaching works here, who to contact, what everything means."

Impact

 

Student partners disseminated the work at a Teaching & Learning Showcase and the Change Agents’ Network Conference 2023.

We created a Criminology version of the glossary for the new programme which was launched in 2023/24 and are now getting ready for the 3rd iteration of the glossary to incorporate the new language of semesters for 24/25.

The glossary is also a useful introduction to new colleagues joining the university, to get to grips with the language and terminology we use in Reading.

Reflections

Sometimes the simplest ideas are the best. The glossary has been a really useful exercise in co-creation with students, ensuring that we meet their needs and by making something of real value to them.

I would recommend that anyone looking to devise this kind of resource, looks to do so with student partners. Partnership working in this way ensures that the materials you produce are appropriate. As always with this kind of work, the students are fantastic at getting their teeth stuck into a project and make a real difference. Co-creation leads to sharing of different perspectives and is always eye-opening, unsurprisingly students know best as to what will resonate with their peers.

One of the biggest challenges was the timing of the project. Our funding did not kick in until August, but we needed to start work before then in order to achieve something useful in time for the start of the next academic year. Juggling student availability, when they have so many calls upon their time is always tricky, but keeping a flexible approach and realising that things do not need to be perfect, is crucial to a successful project.

Full credit to my colleague Dr. Başak Bak who worked on the community-building side of the project, and our fantastic student partners: Laura Carroll, Ambreen Azeem, Ryan Gibbard, Aina Binti Mohammad Abu Sofian, Srijanani Viswanathan, Saydee Brown, Lewis James, Hasti Houshyari and Kartiga Moganan.

Follow up

Having presented this work and its evolutions within Legal Education streams at Law-specific conferences (Society of Legal Scholars, 2023, Socio-Legal Studies Association, 2024) and at the Advance HE Teaching & Learning Conference (2023 & 2024), our glossary has been adopted and adapted by 8 other institutions (to date), many working to co-produce resources with their students:

2023

  • University of York (Law)
  • King’s College, London (Law)
  • University of Lancaster (Law & Student Success Team)
  • University of Salford (School of Science, Engineering & Environment)

Screenshot of the glossary at the Lancaster University Law SchoolScreenshot of the glossary at the University of York Law School

2024

  • University of Cardiff (Law)
  • University of Nottingham (Law)
  • University of Portsmouth (Law)
  • University of Manchester (Law)

I am currently working with colleagues at these institutions to gather feedback and the impact of this work. With cohorts of several hundred (and in one case over 1000) our work has already supported several thousand students nationwide. They are all explicitly acknowledging that their versions were inspired by the work of our student staff partnership.

In 2024 students asked, through course representatives on the Student Staff Partnership Group, whether we could create a Careers-focused Glossary. Jeff Anderson (our Careers Consultant) is working with student representatives and me to produce something suitable.

If you are interested in adopting and adapting the glossary for your students, please get in touch with Amanda as she is very happy to share the materials, advice and wants to gather more evidence of impact of this work.

Links

Improving student awareness of programme information through strategically-timed messaging

Improving student awareness of programme information through strategically-timed messaging

By michaelkilmister Comment Closed

 

By: Dr Jayne Freeman, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, j.e.freeman@reading.ac.uk
Photo by Alejandro Escamilla on Unsplash

Overview

This case study reflects on an approach to enhance awareness of programme-level information in Psychology. Students often appear to have a lack of knowledge about key aspects of their programme. To address this, I introduced an approach of staggering the delivery of key programme-level messages in compulsory modules.

Objectives

  • To enhance undergraduate Psychology students’ awareness of programme-level information by delivering strategically-timed messages in compulsory teaching sessions across the academic year
  • To evaluate students’ perceptions of the usefulness of having programme-level information delivered in teaching sessions

Implementation

I developed a schedule for the timely distribution of programme-level information in compulsory teaching sessions for Part 1-3 Psychology students. This involved creating a table with a list of the key information that students might need to be aware of and some suggestions for when and in which module each message might best fit. For example, information about how to use assessment feedback was timed for when the first assessment marks were due for release. The table also specified the number of slides or approximate amount of time that would be needed to share the information and a suggestion for who might deliver it (e.g., me as Programme Director or the lecturer taking the class). I also included a link to the slides for staff to see the details of the information to be disseminated.

I then shared the table with teaching staff and asked them to indicate whether there would be sufficient time to fit the information in their lectures. In most cases, staff were able to accommodate the messages, or they suggested alternative sessions where the information could be delivered.

Table listing academic topics, timeline, duration, presenters, and suitability for different modules in the autumn term.
Figure 1: List of programme-level messages to be delivered to Part 1 students across Autumn term 2023/24

Impact

At the end of the academic year, students were asked to indicate how helpful it was to receive programme-level messages in lectures and whether they would prefer to receive such messages in lectures or in standalone briefings. They were also asked to say what they had learned from the messages that they hadn’t known before. Approximately, 83% of students reported that they found it quite or very helpful to have the messages in lectures and 65% said that they would prefer to have the messages delivered in lectures than in standalone briefings. Students reported that they had learned about a range of different areas, including student support, the library, marking criteria and other aspects of academic literacy. This suggests that the messages were providing students with important information that they had not obtained from elsewhere.

Reflections

Standalone briefings may not always be the best way of providing students with key messages about their programme as the information might not be reaching students at the optimal time. For example, information about late submission penalties presented in a start of year briefing may well be forgotten by the time students come to submit their first assessment. By strategically timing messages in compulsory lectures, students will have received the information when it was more relevant to them, thus hopefully enhancing its usefulness.

In light of the findings, we will continue to disseminate programme-level information through compulsory lectures (in addition to start of year briefings). However, for next year, I think it will be important for me to work with students to find out what information they consider would be useful and to identify what the optimal timing would be from their perspective, as this might not align with the timeline that I had proposed.